<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo Meta-editing for Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wackylabs.net/2007/01/photo-meta-editing-for-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wackylabs.net/2007/01/photo-meta-editing-for-windows/</link>
	<description>Mostly code, sometimes something else, always slightly wacky.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.wackylabs.net/2007/01/photo-meta-editing-for-windows/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackylabs.net/2007/01/photo-meta-editing-for-windows/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>Call me a cynical old MCSE, but I have this approximate rule thingy: never trust the first release of any Microsoft Product. They usually get it more or less right in the end, but their first efforts are often *cough* flawed....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me a cynical old MCSE, but I have this approximate rule thingy: never trust the first release of any Microsoft Product. They usually get it more or less right in the end, but their first efforts are often *cough* flawed&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Coupe</title>
		<link>http://www.wackylabs.net/2007/01/photo-meta-editing-for-windows/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Coupe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackylabs.net/2007/01/photo-meta-editing-for-windows/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Well, Im not too impressed. See my blog entry at http://gcoupe.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6AA39937A982345B!3121.entry for more info. Apparently it also does odd things with the EXIF data fields as well. Another user reported: &quot;the MS Photo Info Tool appears to do some questionable things with the EXIF data when it writes it. After changing the EXIF date on a test picture, I compared the updated EXIF data with the original EXIF data using exiftool. The file that the MS Tool updated was missing a bunch of fields, and exiftool said that the maker notes were not where they should be. So, if it can&#039;t write the data correctly, it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if it can&#039;t read it correctly either&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Im not too impressed. See my blog entry at <a href="http://gcoupe.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6AA39937A982345B!3121.entry" rel="nofollow">http://gcoupe.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6AA39937A982345B!3121.entry</a> for more info. Apparently it also does odd things with the EXIF data fields as well. Another user reported: &#8220;the MS Photo Info Tool appears to do some questionable things with the EXIF data when it writes it. After changing the EXIF date on a test picture, I compared the updated EXIF data with the original EXIF data using exiftool. The file that the MS Tool updated was missing a bunch of fields, and exiftool said that the maker notes were not where they should be. So, if it can&#8217;t write the data correctly, it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if it can&#8217;t read it correctly either&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

